Skip to content

“Patent troll”: statistical comparison between cases and research papers

Thibault Schrepel
Associate Professor of Law, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Faculty Affiliate, Stanford CodeX

Published
14 January 2014

Cite as Schrepel, Thibault. ““Patent Troll”: Statistical Comparison Between Cases and Research Papers.” Network Law Review (Winter 2014). https://www.networklawreview.org/patent-troll-statistical-comparison-between-cases-and-research-papers/.

Save as PDF Add to your library

This post introduces a new series dedicated to statistical analyses of antitrust law. We called it: “Let’s Stat”.

Patent TrollMethodology:

We entered the keywords “patent troll” on the Papers SSRN search engine, as well as on WestLaw (for all State and Federal cases).

Comments:

  • Of course, the Courts are now using the term “patent troll” for practices they may have described differently in former years. Still, the increased use of “patent troll” keywords appears to be a good indicator of Court tendencies.
  • Papers SSRN does not gather all research papers. However, we presume that SSRN papers are a representative sample of all papers written on the subject.

Subscribe to the Network Law Review

Over 18,000 subscribers. Many of our readers are academics, policymakers and enforcers.