Skip to content

Spring 2024

The Network Law Review publishes four issues a year. Articles go online one by one and are gathered by season. This issue closed with 8 publications.

Contents

Newest first
  1. 5 June 2024

    Antitrust Antidote: March-May 2024

    Nathan Wilson and Koren W. Wong-Ervin

    There were a number of decisions from April-May 2024, covering topics such as (1) the use of the SSNIP test in monopolization (as opposed to merger) cases, which raises the issue of the proper benchmark for the competitive price; (2) the proper methodologies for damages models; and (3) the…

    Read Antitrust Antidote: March-May 2024Cite Antitrust Antidote: March-May 2024

  2. 20 May 2024

    A New Measure For GenAI Competition

    Thibault Schrepel

    This short article serves as an introduction to the working paper by Thibault Schrepel and Jason Potts entitled “Measuring the Openness of AI Foundation Models: Competition and Policy Implications”

    Read A New Measure For GenAI CompetitionCite A New Measure For GenAI Competition

  3. 16 April 2024

    Antitrust Usage and the Secret Handshake

    Daniel Crane

    I was recently proofing edits to a law review article when I noticed that the editors had made a global change to decapitalize “school” in “Chicago School.” I asked to change it back to Chicago School.

    Read Antitrust Usage and the Secret HandshakeCite Antitrust Usage and the Secret Handshake

  4. 9 April 2024

    Bridging Disciplinary Disconnects: The Role of Legal Experts in Legal NLP

    Robert Mahari

    The potential of Natural Language Processing (NLP) to transform the legal industry is increasingly undeniable. NLP can be used to reimagine legal search, improve legal reasoning and writing, answer legal questions, or extract information from legal documents.

    Read Bridging Disciplinary Disconnects: The Role of Legal Experts in Legal NLPCite Bridging Disciplinary Disconnects: The Role of Legal Experts in Legal NLP

  5. 4 April 2024

    Antitrust Market Definition: the Hypothetical Monopolist and Brown Shoe

    Herbert Hovenkamp

    Aside from naked restraints such as price-fixing, antitrust offenses require proof of the defendant’s market power, or ability to profit by raising price above cost. Conventionally we have measured market power “indirectly” by defining a “relevant market” of close substitutes and computing the…

    Read Antitrust Market Definition: the Hypothetical Monopolist and Brown ShoeCite Antitrust Market Definition: the Hypothetical Monopolist and Brown Shoe

  6. 27 March 2024

    The Apple Music Streaming Case: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

    Thibault Schrepel

    On March 4, 2024, the European Commission fined Apple €1.84 billion “over abusive App store rules for music streaming providers”. In particular, the Commission was concerned about the anti-steering provisions that Apple imposed on these providers.

    Read The Apple Music Streaming Case: The Good, The Bad, and The UglyCite The Apple Music Streaming Case: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

  7. 25 March 2024

    The Urgent Need to Tax Digital Advertising

    Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson

    There is widespread agreement that social media has become a major social problem. The original hope was that Facebook, Google, Twitter, and similar products would help people connect and encourage more decentralized forms of human communication, such as sharing local news.

    Read The Urgent Need to Tax Digital AdvertisingCite The Urgent Need to Tax Digital Advertising

  8. 20 March 2024

    Introducing the “Scaling Theory” podcast

    Network Law Review

    The Network Law Review is proud to support the “Scaling Theory” podcast created by Dr. Thibault Schrepel, LL.M. and available on your favorite platforms (Spotify, Apple, YouTube). The podcast is dedicated to exploring the power laws behind the growth of businesses, technologies, legal systems, and…

    Read Introducing the “Scaling Theory” podcastCite Introducing the “Scaling Theory” podcast