Skip to content

“Disruptive innovation”: statistical comparison between cases and scholarly papers

Thibault Schrepel
Associate Professor of Law, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Faculty Affiliate, Stanford CodeX

Published
3 March 2014

Cite as Schrepel, Thibault. ““Disruptive Innovation”: Statistical Comparison Between Cases and Scholarly Papers.” Network Law Review (Winter 2014). https://www.networklawreview.org/disruptive-innovation-statistical-comparison-between-cases-and-scholar-papers/.

Save as PDF Add to your library

This post is from our new series dedicated to statistical analyses of antitrust law. We called it: “Let’s Stat”.

Disruptive innovation

Methodology:

We entered the keywords “disruptive innovation” and “antitrust” on the WestLawNext search engine.

Comments:

  • Here’s a great definition of what a “disruptive innovation” is, by Clayton M. Christensen (Harvard Business School professor): link. In few words, it is “an innovation that helps create a new market and value network, and eventually disrupts an existing market and value network (over a few years or decades), displacing an earlier technology”.
  • This graphic tends to show that judges don’t attach importance to the quality of the innovation, while academics do (more and more).
  • WestLawNext does not gather all scholarly papers. However, we presume that WestLawNext papers are a representative sample of all papers written on the subject.

Subscribe to the Network Law Review

Over 18,000 subscribers. Many of our readers are academics, policymakers and enforcers.